Is this Discrimination?
Click here for Top Ten Discussions. CLICK HERE for Q & A Homepage
Receive Free Rental Owner Updates Email:  
MrLandlord Q & A
     
     
Is this Discrimination? (by Sharon [UT]) May 22, 2017 12:56 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by S i d [MO]) May 22, 2017 1:00 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by S i d [MO]) May 22, 2017 1:01 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) May 22, 2017 1:14 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) May 22, 2017 1:15 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by Deanna [TX]) May 22, 2017 1:16 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by Pattyk [MO]) May 22, 2017 1:19 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by LisaFL [FL]) May 22, 2017 1:23 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by Moshe [CA]) May 22, 2017 1:35 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) May 22, 2017 2:29 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) May 22, 2017 2:41 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by LisaFL [FL]) May 22, 2017 2:41 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by AllyM [NJ]) May 22, 2017 3:12 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by Ed [PA]) May 22, 2017 4:59 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) May 22, 2017 5:07 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by cjo'h [CT]) May 22, 2017 9:20 PM
       Is this Discrimination? (by AllyM [NJ]) May 23, 2017 8:37 AM


Is this Discrimination? (by Sharon [UT]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 12:56 PM
Message:

Hi,

This is my first post to this site. I have been in the landlord business a really long time. Most of my units are houses, but I have an 8 unit, a condo and a few duplexes in Utah.

My question today relates to an issue faced by my daughter and son-in-law. They are renting their personal residence out for a year or two while they are temporarily on work assignment in a different part of the country. He is required to have a certain security clearance for his work. Part of that clearance involves disclosing any payments received from foreign nationals (for a period of 10 years after the fact). They recently received an application to rent their house from a couple that are from another country, but have been granted permanent resident status. The couple have relatives that will be visiting for several months at a time. This information only came up after the credit was run at the time of signing the lease because of a clause limiting long term visitors. My son in law does not want to deal with the hassle of reporting this stuff in relation to his clearance. Is it legal to turn someone who is legally here, but not a US citizen, in a situation like this? Is there a way to legally screen for this on the application? --72.22.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by S i d [MO]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:00 PM
Message:

You cannot discriminate against anyone based on national origin. "I don't want the hassle of reporting stuff" is not relevant. There are a lot of hassles I would like to avoid, but the law says I must do X, so I do X.

Something that confuses me...running the credit report at the time of signing the lease? Shouldn't that have been done before applicant was approved? --173.19.xx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by S i d [MO]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:01 PM
Message:

For future reference:

7 Protected Classes

Race.

Color.

Religion.

Sex.

National Origin.

Disability (added in 1988)

Familial Status (having children under 18 in a household, including pregnant women) (added in 1988) --173.19.xx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:14 PM
Message:

So, just to note it in case it helps... Most definitions of "foreign nationals" when it comes to the government basically means "anyone who is not a 'U.S. person'". However, "U.S. Person" isn't always what you think. It generally includes the following when it comes to defining "foreign nationals":

- U.S. citizen

- Lawful permanent resident (green card holder)

- "Protected Person" (political asylum holder)

So, if they are on a TEMPORARY VISA, then they are a foreign national. However, if they have a green card and are here with "permanent resident status", then they are usually NOT considered a foreign national.

You said that this couple was "granted permanent resident status." From what I understand, that means that they are NOT considered foreign nationals.

- John...

--207.241.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:15 PM
Message:

Also, if you have a clause that does not permit long-term visitors -- and these people admit that they plan to have long-term visitors -- then isn't that reason to deny anyhow regardless of status if they don't want them?

- John...

--207.241.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by Deanna [TX]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:16 PM
Message:

Ahhh, so Applicants turned in an application, and it was discovered at lease-signing that they weren't citizens? So he backed out of lease-signing because he didn't want to report earning rent-money from foreign nationals?

Fair Housing protects "national origin". And you need to screen everyone the same... you can't have a batch of special questions to ask people from India and Pakistan, if you don't ask the same questions of people from Egypt and Qatar.

You can turn someone down because they don't have five years' positive rental history, as long as you're making sure all of your tenants have five years' rental history. But you can't say, "Sorry, you're not a citizen, and it would be a lot of paperwork if I rented to you." However, if he's already told them, "Uh, I hadn't realized y'all were foreign nationals; that is going to be such a headache for me; I don't think we can do this," he's probably going to be on thin ground if he suddenly rejects them on some randomly generated piece of screening criteria.

He might be able to do something by being firm by following up with the "no long-term guests" bit in his lease. It's already there, and the tenant has expressed intentions of violating it. None of his tenants are allowed to have guests for extended visits, regardless of their national origin... or the national origin of the visitors. --96.46.xxx.xx




Is this Discrimination? (by Pattyk [MO]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:19 PM
Message:

I'd stay out of their business.

Cause no harm.

I would refund their screening cost and reject based on that they can't live there based on the terms of the lease -- clause #number here... vistors.

done. move on. it's not about you or the son inlaw's status. --184.206.xxx.xx




Is this Discrimination? (by LisaFL [FL]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:23 PM
Message:

If this is their only rental they are exempt from fair housing regulations:

As written, the FHA covers most — but not all — housing. Some exemptions to coverage under the FHA include: (a) owner-occupied buildings with no more than four units (which is commonly known as the Mrs. Murphy exemption); (b) single family housing sold or rented without the use of a broker if the private individual owner does not own more than three such single family homes at one time; or (c) housing operated by organizations and private clubs that limit occupancy to members. --173.170.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by Moshe [CA]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 1:35 PM
Message:

The applicants, if they have not been naturalized in the US, are foreign nationals.

Based on my own former high-level clearance, and that of my son-in-law's current clearance (even higher level), it is not a problem for your SIL. But he HAS TO disclose.

Having business dealings with a foreign national is NOT a basis for refusing to grant a clearance. But it is the beginning of an investigatory trail that could lead to suspicion depending on the circumstances. But it is ONLY a trailhead that won't lead anywhere if it does not lead to facts that are genuinely a basis for clearance denial. But SIL HAS TO disclose, and that is not a big hassle.

My SIL has to constantly update his handler on the activities of my wife's family back in the old country (I don't have anyone left alive) some of whom are still involved with the military. But it involves nothing more than minimal paperwork.

--47.139.xx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 2:29 PM
Message:

LisaFL: Not if they are in Utah like the original poster is. Utah's state law only mirrors the Mrs. Murphy's exemption (where they have to live in the building). It does not appear to mirror the "three SFHs or less" part. Therefore, from my quick research, in Utah, they would not be exempt.

- John...

--207.241.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 2:41 PM
Message:

Moshe is correct. My piece before (about permanent resident status) is based on an exception for political contributions and exports. For those, they actually do NOT include green card holders as "foreign nationals."

But, Homeland Security -- and the DoE -- specifically DO include them as foreign nationals.

So, disregard my earlier statement.

- John...

--207.241.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by LisaFL [FL]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 2:41 PM
Message:

John,

I looked at the Utah code:

Index Utah Code

Title 57 Real Estate

Chapter 21 Utah Fair Housing Act

Section 3 Exemptions -- Sale by private individuals -- Nonprofit organizations -- Noncommercial transactions. (Effective 5/12/2015)

It provides the same examptions as federal law.

Not sure if you're looking at a local code that supersedes the state code but from what I read they would be exempt....unless I'm not reading it correctly. --173.170.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by AllyM [NJ]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 3:12 PM
Message:

I would focus on the no long term visitors to reject and leave it at that. --73.33.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by Ed [PA]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 4:59 PM
Message:

Reject for long term visitors. They've already told you they intend to move in numerous unauthorized unapproved roommates. The house will be a hotel.

Green card holders are foreign nationals but it is just a little paperwork. Not likely a judge will allow discrimination for that. --96.236.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by John... [MI]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 5:07 PM
Message:

LisaFL: Sorry, you are correct. When I searched earlier, I somehow jumped down to 57-21-3(3) and missed 57-21-3(1). Not sure how I did it.

Man, I screwed up twice in this thread! Not having a good day, I guess. Sorry, all.

- John...

--75.133.xxx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by cjo'h [CT]) Posted on: May 22, 2017 9:20 PM
Message:

Sharon,Seems like everyone is making a mountain out of a mole hill.If they are credit worthy people and they have the money to pay you every month there's no reason to deny that their relatives stay with them for whatever length of time they want,they'll be here three weeks at the most,not everyone thinks this country is that great,they will be wondering why their friends want to come here at all? No health care,like they probably have back there.The people renting have probably been screened more than your son-in-law................Charlie.................................................... --174.199.xx.xxx




Is this Discrimination? (by AllyM [NJ]) Posted on: May 23, 2017 8:37 AM
Message:

You didn't say where the applicants are from but your son in law's job is way more important than these people getting your unit. If they are from a certain area, having relatives come in can endanger your son in law's job.

Again, just use the no longterm visitor rejection. Can't argue with that. --73.33.xxx.xxx





Reply:
Subject: RE: Is this Discrimination?
Your Name:
Your State:

Message:
Is this Discrimination?
Would you like to be notified via email when somebody replies to this thread?
If so, you must include your valid email address here. Do not add your address more than once per thread/subject. By entering your email address here, you agree to receive notification from Mrlandlord.com every time anyone replies to "this" thread. You will receive response notifications for up to one week following the original post. Your email address will not be visible to readers.
Email Address: