Workmans Comp disaster
Click here for Top Ten Discussions. CLICK HERE for Q & A Homepage
Receive Free Rental Owner Updates Email:  
MrLandlord Q & A
     
     
Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 24, 2016 1:07 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by razorback_tim [AR]) Jun 24, 2016 1:10 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by BRAD 20,000 [IN]) Jun 24, 2016 1:37 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Robert J [CA]) Jun 24, 2016 1:38 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Steve [MA]) Jun 24, 2016 1:39 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 24, 2016 1:57 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Jun 24, 2016 3:44 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by razorback_tim [AR]) Jun 24, 2016 3:52 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Jun 24, 2016 4:02 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Debbie [VA]) Jun 24, 2016 5:03 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 24, 2016 5:06 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by #22 [MO]) Jun 24, 2016 8:23 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 24, 2016 8:33 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 24, 2016 8:44 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by #22 [MO]) Jun 25, 2016 12:34 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Blue [IL]) Jun 25, 2016 4:00 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Bohemia [IL]) Jun 25, 2016 4:55 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by #22 [MO]) Jun 25, 2016 6:54 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Chris [CT]) Jun 25, 2016 10:43 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Chris [CT]) Jun 25, 2016 10:48 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 25, 2016 10:53 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 25, 2016 11:35 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Debbie [VA]) Jun 25, 2016 4:52 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Sisco [MO]) Jun 25, 2016 6:56 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Blue [IL]) Jun 25, 2016 9:10 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Rocking Bear [FL]) Jun 25, 2016 11:00 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 26, 2016 3:55 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 26, 2016 8:21 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Jun 26, 2016 10:51 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 26, 2016 11:32 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Jun 26, 2016 12:47 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Jon S [PA]) Jun 26, 2016 7:21 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Jun 26, 2016 7:49 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by don [PA]) Jun 26, 2016 9:00 PM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Blue [IL]) Jun 27, 2016 5:54 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by RentsDue [MA]) Jun 27, 2016 6:00 AM
       Workmans Comp disaster (by Adele [FL]) Jun 27, 2016 7:19 PM


Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 1:07 PM
Message:

I took 2 employees in late last summer. I'm having my first audit for workmans comp. The workmans comp insurance is saying that I have to pay workmans comp on sub-contractors too

Why on earth would I have to pay workmans comp on a sub contractor?

Workmans comp pays an employee a set amount of money for a certain time if they get hurt.

If a sub gets hurt, that's on the sub.

How would workmans comp even pay them?

Any ideas on how to fight it? --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by razorback_tim [AR]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 1:10 PM
Message:

You need to require your subs to have their own workers comp policy or a worker's comp waiver if PA has such a thing. Then you won't have to pay workers comp on them. I've had workers comp policy for about 13 years and I've paid very little premium on subs because I've been diligent about getting their certificates or waivers. --166.137.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by BRAD 20,000 [IN]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 1:37 PM
Message:

"Well if it's not one thing

it's another."

-Rosanna Rosannadana

They'll getcha comin anda goin. --73.146.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Robert J [CA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 1:38 PM
Message:

For several years the State Owned Agency of California for Workers Comp Insurance, State Fund, worked hand in had to change the State Law to limit employers options dealing with Workers Comp Insurance.

The State managed to make other insurance carrier to exclude workers comp insurance in their fire and liability policies. The did away with most employers being self insured.

For a period the State had contractors and landlords over a barrel. Insurance costing the same as the employee pay rolls. --173.55.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Steve [MA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 1:39 PM
Message:

In the eyes of the insurance industry any sub who you don't have a valid WC & Liability certificate for is considered an employee of yours. Before your audit make sure you have an actual insurance certificate for all of your subcontractors. If for some reason you can't get a certificate have the sub redo their bill showing a bread down of labor & materials. You won't have to pay a premium for the material portion. In the future it would behoove you to either not let anyone work until you have their valid insurance certificate or at the very least withhold 20 or 25% of their fee until you have the certificate. --72.93.xxx.x




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 1:57 PM
Message:

Well, if this is truly the case and I have to pay workmans comp on someone who isn't an employee, it looks like my employees will be unemployed very soon.

I'll go back to the way I have been doing things for years. I'm not going to be punished financially for something on the left, when I was trying to do something properly on the right. --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 3:44 PM
Message:

Is it good idea to have contractors to sign liability waiver for all jobs? --97.91.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by razorback_tim [AR]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 3:52 PM
Message:

Here's how I do mine.

I own rentals in:

Razorback LLC

Razorback and partner 1 LLC

Razorback and partner 2 LLC

I have another entity:

Razorback construction LLC

Razorback construction LLC has a workers comp policy and an employee. The employee does work for all 3 LLC's that own rental property. Razorback construction invoices for employee's time and materials.

If a sub is needed to do work on the rentals, the LLC that owns the property hires and pays the sub. So Razorback construction pays no subs and therefore doesn't pay workers compensation on the subs. If I ever start building or doing remodels for 3rd parties again then that will change and subs will have to have their own workers comp policy or a waiver.

You need to ask your insurance agent if there is any kind of waiver that you can have subs sign so that they are exempt from premium under your policy. Arkansas has a state waiver program. I googled PA but didn't find one. On the other hand since this situation has caught you by surprise it doesn't speak well of your agent for not informing you that this was the case regarding paying premiums on subs.

Hope this helps. --70.178.xx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 4:02 PM
Message:

Razorback, I am sorry, I do not total understand.

We do not have employee. We own rentals. we have managementment LLC to manage our rentals.

I learnt to sign independent contractor agreement before. NO after I read here, It seems very good idea if we have contractor or anyone work for us to sign liability waiver.

Am I right? --97.91.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Debbie [VA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 5:03 PM
Message:

As soon as you tell those employees that they don't have jobs anymore, you will get a bill from unemployment!! --67.211.xx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 5:06 PM
Message:

Debbie. You're probably right! Luckily we just completed a project without a new one in sight.

Maybe I just won't get one for a while...

Where there's a will, there's a will, right? --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by #22 [MO]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 8:23 PM
Message:

Fire the agent that sold you your policy.

I almost stepped into this trap and was advised of this pitfall by a great independent agent.

Your best bet:

Have the subs that have done work for you break their invoices from the past under scrutiny into

Labor

and

Materials.

You might be off the hook on the costs of the materials.

--108.218.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 8:33 PM
Message:

#22, I'm talking about things like my excavator and gutter guy.

He brings his machine from a previous job to my site, digs a ditch, fills a foundation and grades out the lot. Then he loads his machine up and take it to the next job.

He is NOT an employee.

The gutter guy (who actually is the same guy), brings his gutter trailer to the jobsite from his previous job, hangs gutters at my house and moves on to another job.

He is not my employee.

I should not have to pay comp on a guy like this. He should not have the same rights to file claim and collect as my hourly employees do. --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 24, 2016 8:44 PM
Message:

Another example is Demo jobs or clean out jobs.

I have one guy who does tons of different jobs. He could be roofing somewhere one day and dry-walling the next. I'll have him come and demo a room for a set price and remove the debris.

He is also not my employee.

I have an estate clean out guy who has a business of cleaning out buildings. He'll come and clean out a ranch house for $500-$700. He removes all the debris and goes to another job.

He's not my employee.

Anyway, I intend to fight this one way or another. --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by #22 [MO]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 12:34 AM
Message:

Assuming comps works the same in both of our states: you're on the hook for guys that don't have comp. Your digger probably has a policy. Your gutter guy, probably not. Have him itemize materials on his past invoices to.mitigate the pending comp beat down. I hope you win your appeal, but I'm not sure you have much of a chance - you'll be dealing with beaurocrats. It doesn't matter in my state if the person is your employee or your sub - a person's comp covers them. You got hosed by the person that sold you your policy - they needed to tell you this before you got to this point. Good luck --70.195.xx.x




Workmans Comp disaster (by Blue [IL]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 4:00 AM
Message:

Good lord. I had never heard of this before.

Legitimate question, and I'm not trying to turn this into anything political: if we had universal health care in this country, would this no longer be an issue?

Because that is the whole purpose of workman's comp, right? To pay if someone gets hurt? --75.132.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Bohemia [IL]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 4:55 AM
Message:

Blue: WC isn't just coverage for medical bills. It's coverage for short (or long) term disability. So no, universal health care wouldn't substitute. --75.129.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by #22 [MO]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 6:54 AM
Message:

It's also to keep the ambulance chasers away. Every time someone gets crippled brown and kreupen does a happy dance. --70.195.xx.x




Workmans Comp disaster (by Chris [CT]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 10:43 AM
Message:

When you hire a contractor like your excavator he needs his own insurance and he needs to provide you with a copy of it.

If he doesn't have it than your insurance company will want you to pay for it. What your running into it seems is your hiring uninsured contractors.

The reason behind all this, is because if Bob has no insurance and he falls off the machine and gets hurt who pays for it?

From experience I'll tell you the answer its YOU!

Now that you have assets you need to be careful of this stuff, because if something bad happens they sue everyone and whoever has the deeper pockets pays more. Also don't for a second think LLC's will help you here.

You also take liability for whatever tools you provide. My uncle had to pay out over $200k for a nail gun accident about 10 years ago.

--67.82.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Chris [CT]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 10:48 AM
Message:

This is a fun game once you get a bit bigger than OSHA comes into the picture. My framer got nailed twice by OSHA. $10k for not using a proper platform to lift the guys with the LULL, and $2,500 a man times about 5-6 for not wearing harness's above the second floor.

Luckily OSHA typically only bothers contractors and the fines go to the contractor. So if NE's excavator is down in the hole without a box with one of his workers he will have to pay the fine not NE. --67.82.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 10:53 AM
Message:

I collect general liability insurance from these guys. This is what their insurance providers give to them. I've done that for years.

Workmans comp is say NOT GOOD ENOUGH!

That's the part I don't get.

When I set up payroll and workmans comp, I was told specifically that I couldn't get comp on myself.

Now, why would a sole proprietor, self employed sub

Contractor get workmans comp on himself?

Who is he going to sue if he's out working?

Himself?

I know I can't really compare this situation to when my guys are out working for owner occupant home owners, but for the sake of the argument, I will.

If my guys are out working on drywall at Dave and Sally's house and fall off the ladder, Dave and Sally may get sued. If Dave and small hire my guys, they

Should've asked for their insurance up front. What they would've got is a copy of a general liability policy.

A few years ago, I got a contractors registration with the state and was required to have liability insurance.

I did it, I no longer do it because I don't work on other peoples places, only my own.

In 10 years, this is the first time ever that I am heairibg that someone in my position has to pay workmans comp on a 1099 employed. Given the nature of the relationship, it doesn't make sense.

The IRS and the WC provider views employees and subs differently it seems.

--50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 11:35 AM
Message:

I just looked over 2 of my guys insurance policies and it has a line item for workers comp right on their policies and it's labeled: N/A, right from the insurance company itself.

I'm not sure about all this, but I'm not going down without a fight with these people.

Let them sue me. --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Debbie [VA]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 4:52 PM
Message:

That liine item on the certificate of insurance labled N/A means there is no WC coverage. Standard for the insurance coverage to fill it in that way. You WC problem is not new. The insurance company always does an annual premium audit for payroll and asks if you sub any work out. If you answer yes, you better have copies of the subs WC or you will pay. This is standard for WC. --67.211.xx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Sisco [MO]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 6:56 PM
Message:

NE, take a step back and look again from insurance company perspective.

You are an employer who carries wc, they demand that everyone of your employees be included, you agreed to this when you signed the policy and that you pay premiums on everyone; all employees, subs or whatever you call them

If and only if, you can substantiate the claim that this subcontractor is not an employee and does carry his own wc policy will you be keeping your agreement with wc provider.

Subs without wc could have your cost of wc deducted from their settlements with you. --72.172.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Blue [IL]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 9:10 PM
Message:

OK, jumping in as a 1099 employee myself.

Now, as a graphic artist, I work in nice clean offices sitting at a desk. I come and go as I please, so definitely a sub contractor. I don't work with ladders or power tools.

Are my clients required to carry WC on me? I've never been asked for insurance. I am a sole proprietorship, I carry health insurance of course but no other (liability type) insurance. --75.132.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Rocking Bear [FL]) Posted on: Jun 25, 2016 11:00 PM
Message:

Lawyers and insurance the biggest rackets ever next to banks and sadly needed at times. --71.1.xx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 3:55 AM
Message:

Blue in my situation, according to them, yes you

would. --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 8:21 AM
Message:

I think I found out where I messed up with this. I think my paying John Doe instead of Doe Masonary and Concrete or John Doe Electrical was the difference.

We get paid in money or education. This time I'm getting paid in education. --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 10:51 AM
Message:

PE, Thanks for sharing with us. It is important lesson for all of us.

So we will not write check to any personal name.

Do you think independent contractor agreement makes difference?

People mentioned liability waiver too? --97.91.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 11:32 AM
Message:

CJ, I'm not sure at this point. It varies state to state.

It appears to be as simple as paying them as a company name vs individual. I have plenty of individuals that were paid as company names that the WC audit would have picked up, but no mention was made of them.

I will know more tomorrow when I talk to them. --70.215.xx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by CJ [MO]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 12:47 PM
Message:

I am easy when contractors tell me to let them put the name on my check. Even they have business, they want to have the check in their name some times. I will have to be strict on put their business name on my check from now on.

--97.91.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Jon S [PA]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 7:21 PM
Message:

The irony is... if you didn't have employees and consequently paying worker's comp then you wouldn't be in this situation.

I don't hire employees with rentals for this reason. I have them for other businesses, but we don't use subs so the answer for that question in my audits was always no. I never knew how close I was to opening pandora's box until I read your post. --71.195.xx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by NE [PA]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 7:49 PM
Message:

Jon S, luckily this is my flip llc, not my rental llc.

When these guys go off to college this fall, I will phase out of having employees. --50.107.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by don [PA]) Posted on: Jun 26, 2016 9:00 PM
Message:

Blue---"1099 employee" is a contradiction in terms. An employee gets a w-2, not a 1099-----and a contract worker that gets a 1099 can not be an employee. --73.141.xxx.xxx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Blue [IL]) Posted on: Jun 27, 2016 5:54 AM
Message:

1099 work. That better. You knew what I meant. --75.132.xxx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by RentsDue [MA]) Posted on: Jun 27, 2016 6:00 AM
Message:

It gets even better. We have had sub- contractors with WC, yet still had to pay comp on them anyway. Here they can buy a WC policy and have the option of excluding themselves from the policy. Many do this because it keeps their premiums low. But then you write a check to them....the excluded sub who isn't included in his own policy. So comp makes you cover them. They basically have a $500 a year comp policy that covers nobody but allows them to pull permits. --70.215.xx.xx




Workmans Comp disaster (by Adele [FL]) Posted on: Jun 27, 2016 7:19 PM
Message:

Brad, Retro : Rosanna Rosannadana!!! Thanks for bringing her up!

Get cautious everyone. Lawsuits abound. --216.53.xxx.xxx





Reply:
Subject: RE: Workmans Comp disaster
Your Name:
Your State:

Message:
Workmans Comp disaster
Would you like to be notified via email when somebody replies to this thread?
If so, you must include your valid email address here. Do not add your address more than once per thread/subject. By entering your email address here, you agree to receive notification from Mrlandlord.com every time anyone replies to "this" thread. You will receive response notifications for up to one week following the original post. Your email address will not be visible to readers.
Email Address: